The Fed-Express
January 29th 2007 09:24
As a Victorian and someone who resides pretty close to the heart of Melbourne, the Australian Open is ‘must watch’ television. As usual the Open did not disappoint with the quality and the caliber of play. The women’s draw was heavily contested and hard to pick until the final was played. Serena Williams was able to muscle her way through Maria Sharapova in a dominant display. The men’s draw was exactly the opposite. It was simple. Who was going to beat Federer?
Roger Federer has dominated tennis over the past few years and is clearly the stand out, the one to beat and the one who will break all the records. You could describe the situation, as he being the best and daylight between him and second best. You may think I am pointing out the obvious but to me it was quite disappointing watching a final that I believed was going to be a hard fought contest.
Fernando Gonsalez won his semi-final comprehensively, beating Tommy Haas in straight sets, which included 45 winners and 3 unforced errors. He found form at the right end of the tournament and apparently ready to take on the worlds number one. Wrong. Federer would win in straight sets and kill any hopes of an under dog winning the tournament. He was also kind enough to mention how he could not see where Fernando had improved over the last six months. His arrogance was obvious and so was his tennis.
In mentioning his arrogance and his choice of words at times, you also have to marvel at his brilliance. You couldn’t blame the guy for becoming slightly arrogant. He is a champion and he could be the best sports person the world has ever seen. For is there anyone else that dominates his/her sport quite like Federer?
| 136 |
| Vote |







Comments (13)
Add Comments




